Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsCOSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) with 16% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Implementation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Resilience Model(6 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach3 targets
Principle 17Pursues Improvement in ERM
Principle 18Leverages Information and Technology
Principle 19Communicates Risk Information

Implementation(2 mappings)

FATF-TR-IMP-03VASP AML/CFT2 targets
Principle 3Defines Desired Culture
Principle 7Defines Risk Appetite

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 19 controls across its framework, while COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Implementation, where 15 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

Of 19 total BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 3 map directly to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

16 BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). The highest concentration of gaps is in Implementation with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Implementation (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.