Cross-Framework Mapping

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational ResiliencevsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 8% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operations.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Resilience Model(4 mappings)

BS65000-RM-01Resilience Journey2 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
BS65000-RM-02Integrated Approach2 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

Related Comparisons

Other BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience has 26 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operations, where 8 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 26 total BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

24 BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operations with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BS 65000:2014 - Guidance on Organizational Resilience and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operations (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.