Cross-Framework Mapping

BIMCO Cyber SecurityvsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how BIMCO Cyber Security controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BIMCO Cyber Security maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 25% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 BIMCO Cyber Security controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management(1 mappings)

BIMCO-07Personnel risk assessment
NAIC-668-3Definitions

BIMCO Cyber Security: Incident Response & Recovery(1 mappings)

BIMCO-18Reporting obligations to authorities
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation

BIMCO Cyber Security: Supply Chain & Configuration(7 mappings)

BIMCO-21Supply chain risk management for critical components2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks
BIMCO-22Configuration management for OT systems2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks
BIMCO-23Change management procedures2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks
BIMCO-24Vulnerability assessment for critical systems
NAIC-668-3Definitions

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BIMCO Cyber Security and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

BIMCO Cyber Security has 24 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security, where 5 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between BIMCO Cyber Security and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 24 total BIMCO Cyber Security controls, 6 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BIMCO Cyber Security to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

18 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BIMCO Cyber Security and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is BIMCO Cyber Security: Systems Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.