Cross-Framework Mapping

BIMCO Cyber Securityvs21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how BIMCO Cyber Security controls map to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BIMCO Cyber Security maps to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice with 17% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 BIMCO Cyber Security controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BIMCO Cyber Security: Asset Identification & Governance(3 mappings)

BIMCO-02System security categorization3 targets
CFR211-G-122Section 211.122 — Materials Examination and Usage Criteria
CFR211-G-125Section 211.125 — Labeling Issuance
CFR211-G-130Section 211.130 — Packaging and Labeling Operations

BIMCO Cyber Security: Supply Chain & Configuration(3 mappings)

BIMCO-21Supply chain risk management for critical components
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records
BIMCO-22Configuration management for OT systems
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records
BIMCO-23Change management procedures
CFR211-J-184Section 211.184 — Component, Drug Product Container, Closure, and Labeling Records

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BIMCO Cyber Security and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

BIMCO Cyber Security has 24 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management, where 5 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between BIMCO Cyber Security and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

Of 24 total BIMCO Cyber Security controls, 4 map directly to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BIMCO Cyber Security to 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

20 BIMCO Cyber Security controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BIMCO Cyber Security and 21 CFR Part 211 — Current Good Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is BIMCO Cyber Security: Access Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.