Cross-Framework Mapping

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018)vsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 36% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Title 1: General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Title 3: Specific Processing Situations(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-11Article 189 — Employment Context Processing2 targets
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Title 4: Remedies and Penalties(3 mappings)

BE-DPA-13Article 221 — Administrative Fines2 targets
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
BE-DPA-14Article 222 — Criminal Penalties
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Title 1, Chapter II: Principles Relating to Processing(2 mappings)

BE-DPA-5Article 8 — Processing of Special Categories of Data2 targets
CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Title 2: Data Protection Authority(1 mappings)

BE-DPA-7Article 23 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Related Comparisons

Other Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) comparisons

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Title 1: General Provisions, where 3 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 14 total Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls, 5 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

9 Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Title 1: General Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Belgium Data Protection Act (Wet van 30 juli 2018, Loi du 30 juillet 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Title 1: General Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.