Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk
ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
ORAN-SEC-2.1Interface Security Requirements
ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation
ORAN-SEC-4.1Security Test Specifications

BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

BCBS239-06Network security and segmentation
ORAN-SEC-2.3Least Privilege and Zero Trust
BCBS239-08Application security controls
ORAN-SEC-5.2Application Security
BCBS239-09Encryption and key management
ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)

BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(2 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management
ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 10 map directly to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

15 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.