BCBS 239vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
BCBS 239 maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 7% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 BCBS 239 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239 Risk Reporting Practices.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
BCBS 239 Overarching Governance and Infrastructure(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other BCBS 239 comparisons
Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
BCBS 239 has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239 Risk Reporting Practices, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.
How many controls map between BCBS 239 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
Of 14 total BCBS 239 controls, 1 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
13 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239 Risk Reporting Practices with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?
The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239 Risk Reporting Practices (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.