Cross-Framework Mapping

BCBS 239vsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

BCBS 239 maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(4 mappings)

BCBS239-03Risk appetite and tolerance for IT risk2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management
BCBS239-05Roles and responsibilities definition2 targets
EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy

BCBS 239: Operational Resilience(10 mappings)

BCBS239-11Business continuity planning and testing3 targets
EBA-GL-3.7.1Business Continuity Policy
EBA-GL-3.7.3Business Continuity Planning
EBA-GL-3.7.5Testing of Plans
BCBS239-12Disaster recovery procedures4 targets
EBA-GL-3.7.1Business Continuity Policy
EBA-GL-3.7.3Business Continuity Planning
EBA-GL-3.7.4Response and Recovery Plans
EBA-GL-3.7.5Testing of Plans
BCBS239-13Third-party dependency management
EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
BCBS239-14Critical service identification
EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
BCBS239-15Communication and escalation procedures
EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management

BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(4 mappings)

BCBS239-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management
BCBS239-19Concentration risk management2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework
EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between BCBS 239 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 9 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

16 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.