BCBS 239vsCOSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)
See exactly how BCBS 239 controls map to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
BCBS 239 maps to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 BCBS 239 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BCBS 239: Information Security Governance(5 mappings)
BCBS 239: Third-Party Risk Management(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other BCBS 239 comparisons
Other COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between BCBS 239 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
BCBS 239 has 25 controls across its framework, while COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 BCBS 239 controls have no direct COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) equivalent.
How many controls map between BCBS 239 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
Of 25 total BCBS 239 controls, 4 map directly to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping BCBS 239 to COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
21 BCBS 239 controls have no direct equivalent in COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017). The highest concentration of gaps is in BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between BCBS 239 and COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) Framework (2017)?
The domain with the highest gap count is BCBS 239: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.