Cross-Framework Mapping

Azure Security BenchmarkvsISO 13485

See exactly how Azure Security Benchmark controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
38
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Azure Security Benchmark maps to ISO 13485 with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 54 Azure Security Benchmark controls identifies 47 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 54 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

ASB-03Cloud risk assessment
ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis

Azure Security Benchmark: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

ASB-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud2 targets
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
ASB-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization

Azure Security Benchmark: Data Protection in Cloud(11 mappings)

ASB-12Encryption of cloud-stored data5 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
ASB-13Data residency and sovereignty3 targets
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
ASB-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Azure Security Benchmark: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

ASB-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Azure Security Benchmark and ISO 13485?

Azure Security Benchmark has 54 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity Management, where 5 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between Azure Security Benchmark and ISO 13485?

Of 54 total Azure Security Benchmark controls, 7 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 47 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Azure Security Benchmark to ISO 13485?

47 Azure Security Benchmark controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Azure Security Benchmark and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.