TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)vsUK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers

See exactly how AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls map to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
56%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) maps to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers with 56% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls identifies 11 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Incident Response and Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Security Management and Governance(3 mappings)

AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment2 targets
→A.2Risk Assessment
→CRP-1Cyber Risk Profile Assessment
AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→A.5Security Training and Awareness

Access Control and Identity Management(2 mappings)

AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→B.1Access Control
AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
→B.1Access Control

Network and Communications Security(4 mappings)

AWWA-3.1Network Segmentation
→B.3Network Security
AWWA-3.2Remote Access Security
→B.2Data Protection and Encryption
AWWA-3.4Encryption and Data Protection2 targets
→B.2Data Protection and Encryption
→D.1Incident Response Planning

System Security and Operations(2 mappings)

AWWA-4.3Configuration Management
→B.4Secure Configuration
AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→C.2Security Event Logging

Incident Response and Recovery(9 mappings)

AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan2 targets
→D.1Incident Response Planning
→D.2Incident Reporting
AWWA-5.3Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery
→D.3Backup and Recovery
AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→D.3Backup and Recovery
AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing3 targets
→D.1Incident Response Planning
→D.2Incident Reporting
→D.3Backup and Recovery
ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics2 targets
→D.1Incident Response Planning
→D.2Incident Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CSA CCM v418 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs South Korea ISMS-P18 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs Azure Security Benchmark16 mappings

Other UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers16 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) has 25 controls across its framework, while UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (56% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Incident Response and Recovery, where 4 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers equivalent.

How many controls map between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

Of 25 total AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls, 14 map directly to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers controls — representing 56% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) to UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

11 AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls have no direct equivalent in UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers. The highest concentration of gaps is in Incident Response and Recovery with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) and UK Defence Standard 05-138 — Cyber Security for Defence Suppliers?

The domain with the highest gap count is Incident Response and Recovery (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.