Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
13
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud2 targets
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A07:2025Authentication Failures
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments3 targets
A01:2025Broken Access Control
A06:2025Insecure Design
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
A04:2025Cryptographic Failures

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
A02:2025Security Misconfiguration

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud
A09:2025Security Logging and Alerting Failures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP Top 10:2025?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 16 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud, where 4 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 8 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to OWASP Top 10:2025?

17 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.