TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsNYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment3 targets
→NYDFS-500.14cCybersecurity Awareness Training
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments
→NYDFS-500.9bRisk Assessment Content

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud3 targets
→314.4(c)(5)Multi-factor authentication
→HIPAA-164.312(d)Person or entity authentication
→NYDFS-500.12Multi-Factor Authentication
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments2 targets
→NYDFS-500-CLA-4Privileged Access Management
→NYDFS-500.7Access Privileges and Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→NYDFS-500.13Asset Management and Data Governance
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
→314.4(c)(3)Encryption requirements
→NYDFS-500.15Encryption of Nonpublic Information
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud2 targets
→NYDFS-500.16Incident Response and Business Continuity
→NYDFS-500.2bProgram Core Functions

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(6 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging3 targets
→314.4(c)(8)Monitoring and logging
→NYDFS-500-CLA-3Endpoint Detection and Response
→NYDFS-500.14Monitoring and Logging
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→NYDFS-500.16Incident Response and Business Continuity
→NYDFS-500.3Cybersecurity Policy
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→NYDFS-500.5Penetration Testing and Vulnerability Assessments

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)22 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)22 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)21 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)21 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 9 map directly to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

16 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NYDFS Cybersecurity Regulation (23 NYCRR Part 500)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.