TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 40% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition3 targets
→3.3Record Completion and Maintenance
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→3.11Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud2 targets
→3.7Identification and Authentication
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
→3.7.1Multi-Factor Authentication Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(5 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud2 targets
→3.6Incident Response
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management2 targets
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging2 targets
→3.12Security Assessment and Monitoring
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud2 targets
→3.6Incident Response
→3.6.1Incident Response Plan Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring, where 3 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 10 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.