Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsISO 13485

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to ISO 13485. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

16
Controls Mapped
73
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to ISO 13485 with 8% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 89 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 82 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Identity & Access Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 89 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cloud Security Overview(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
ISO13485-06Security management process and risk analysis

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud2 targets
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(11 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data5 targets
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud3 targets
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud3 targets
ISO13485-03Minimum necessary standard enforcement
ISO13485-04Patient data de-identification procedures
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 13485?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 89 controls across its framework, while ISO 13485 covers 29 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Identity & Access Management, where 15 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct ISO 13485 equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 13485?

Of 89 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 7 map directly to ISO 13485 controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 82 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to ISO 13485?

82 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 13485. The highest concentration of gaps is in Identity & Access Management with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and ISO 13485?

The domain with the highest gap count is Identity & Access Management (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.