TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsIMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) with 16% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→IMO-CY-1.3Roles and Responsibilities
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
→IMO-CY-1.2Cyber Risk Assessment

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud2 targets
→IMO-CY-4.1Response Planning
→IMO-CY-5.1Recovery Planning

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(1 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
→IMO-CY-3.1Anomaly Detection

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)8 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)7 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) covers 12 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 4 map directly to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

21 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and IMO Maritime Cybersecurity Guidelines (MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3/Rev.2)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.