TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
36%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 36% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition
→EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(10 mappings)

AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
→DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data3 targets
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
→TSSR-INFO-1Network Data Protection
AWS-WA-14Data backup and recovery in cloud4 targets
→EIOPA-GL-22Response and Recovery Plans
→EIOPA-GL-23Testing of Plans
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TSSR-INFO-1Network Data Protection
AWS-WA-15Secure data deletion in cloud2 targets
→GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
→TSSR-INFO-1Network Data Protection

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(4 mappings)

AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging2 targets
→EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring
→GLI33-4.4Audit Trail and Logging
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
→GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing
AWS-WA-24Cloud change management
→EIOPA-GL-15ICT Project and Change Management

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (36% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 9 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 36% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

16 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.