Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsCNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) with 32% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 17 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Identity & Access in Cloud(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management
DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Data Protection in Cloud(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Infrastructure Security(2 mappings)

AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
DEP-4Host Suitability Validation
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
DEP-4Host Suitability Validation

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring(3 mappings)

AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud
RUN-O2Incident Response Automation
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-O2Incident Response Automation

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

Other CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 8 map directly to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

17 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.