Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsCNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

28
Controls Mapped
67
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) with 20% coverage across 19 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 95 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 76 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.5 Organizational Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 95 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 28 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(15 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management
DEP-2Infrastructure as Code Security
ISO27001-A.5.17Credential and secret management
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
DIST-4Supply Chain Integrity
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
DIST-4Supply Chain Integrity
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
DIST-4Supply Chain Integrity
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness
RUN-O2Incident Response Automation
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation
RUN-O2Incident Response Automation
ISO27001-A.5.27Post-incident review and improvement
RUN-O2Incident Response Automation
ISO27001-A.5.3Separation of conflicting duties2 targets
DIST-3Registry Security
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management

A.8 Technological Controls(5 mappings)

ISO27001-A.8.18Restricted use of system-level utilities
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ISO27001-A.8.2Elevated privilege governance
RUN-A1Identity and Access Management
ISO27001-A.8.24Cryptographic protection and key management2 targets
DIST-2Artifact Signing
RUN-S1Data Encryption at Rest
ISO27001-A.8.25Security-integrated development lifecycle
DEV-1Security Checks in Development

+8 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

Other CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

ISO 27001:2022 has 95 controls across its framework, while CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 19 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.5 Organizational Controls, where 29 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

Of 95 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 19 map directly to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation) controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 76 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

76 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation). The highest concentration of gaps is in A.5 Organizational Controls with 29 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and CNCF Cloud Native Security (Cloud Native Computing Foundation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.5 Organizational Controls (29 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.