TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AWS Well-Architected Security PillarvsCambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)

See exactly how AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls map to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar maps to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) with 4% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 25 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 25 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Governance(7 mappings)

AWS-WA-01Shared responsibility model definition7 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Sec. 2Interpretation
→Sec. 3Scope and Application

Related Comparisons

Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs Azure Security Benchmark19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-19019 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs CAIQ (CSA)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701719 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs MTCS (Singapore)19 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs ISO 2701819 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs NIST SP 800-14519 mappingsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar vs C5 (Germany)19 mappings

Other Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)16 mappingsEU Digital Markets Act vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappings6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673) vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappingsISO 8000 — Data Quality vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappingsFATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappingsPrivacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles vs Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar has 25 controls across its framework, while Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring, where 5 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) equivalent.

How many controls map between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

Of 25 total AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, 1 map directly to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

24 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls have no direct equivalent in Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134). The highest concentration of gaps is in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar: Cloud Operations & Monitoring (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.