Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR)vsCambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)

See exactly how Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls map to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) maps to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) with 14% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Compliance and Enforcement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Consent and Authorization(14 mappings)

CDR-1Consumer Consent Framework4 targets
Art. 10Consent Requirements
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 7Minimum Standards
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
CDR-3Consent Withdrawal10 targets
152FZ-1Scope of the Federal Law (Article 1)
Art. 10Consent Requirements
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 19Consent Management Controls
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 7Minimum Standards
Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
EPDPA-1Scope of Regulation (§1)
Sec. 2Interpretation

Privacy and Security Safeguards(6 mappings)

CDR-11Data Minimization6 targets
152FZ-1Scope of the Federal Law (Article 1)
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 19Consent Management Controls
Art. 8Data Categories
EPDPA-1Scope of Regulation (§1)
Sec. 2Interpretation

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) comparisons

Other Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) has 50 controls across its framework, while Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Compliance and Enforcement, where 34 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

Of 50 total Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls, 7 map directly to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) to Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

43 Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) controls have no direct equivalent in Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134). The highest concentration of gaps is in Compliance and Enforcement with 34 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) and Cambodia Sub-Decree on Personal Data Protection (Sub-Decree No. 134)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Compliance and Enforcement (34 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.