TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global StandardsvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 38% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 42 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls identifies 26 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in WCO SAFE Pillar 3 - Customs-to-Government.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 42 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

AEO Conditions and Requirements (SAFE Annex IV)(20 mappings)

AEO-10Education, Training and Awareness
→NIST-CSF-PR.AT-01Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
AEO-12Crisis Management and Incident Recovery2 targets
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-04Incident response plans and other cybersecurity plans that affect operations are established, communicated, maintained, and improved
→NIST-CSF-RC.RP-01The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
AEO-13Measurement, Analyses and Improvement
→NIST-CSF-ID.IM-03Improvements are identified from execution of operational processes, procedures, and activities
AEO-2Demonstrated Compliance with Customs Requirements4 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.OC-03Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition
AEO-4Financial Viability3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed prior to acquisition
AEO-5Premises Security2 targets
→NIST-CSF-DE.CM-02The physical environment is monitored to find potentially adverse events
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-06Physical access to assets is managed, monitored, and enforced commensurate with risk
AEO-6Cargo Security
→NIST-CSF-GV.PO-01Policy for managing cybersecurity risks is established based on organizational context, cybersecurity strategy, and priorities and is communicated and enforced
AEO-7Trading Partner Security3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-05Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
AEO-8Personnel Security
→NIST-CSF-GV.RR-04Cybersecurity is included in human resources practices
AEO-9Information Exchange, Access and Confidentiality
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
SAFE-AEO-DConsultation, Co-operation and Communication
→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls your existing Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 38% in the header counts how many Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards comparisons

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 514 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs SOC 212 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs ISO 27002:202211 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 LOW9 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE9 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs FedRAMP Moderate9 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH9 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0106 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsFedRAMP High vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsSOC 2 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0104 mappingsAustralian Information Security Manual vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0103 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards has 42 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in WCO SAFE Pillar 3 - Customs-to-Government, where 12 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 42 total Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls, 16 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, representing 38% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

26 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in WCO SAFE Pillar 3 - Customs-to-Government with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is WCO SAFE Pillar 3 - Customs-to-Government (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.