TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global StandardsvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 25% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 36 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AEO Eligibility and Compliance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 36 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

AEO Security Requirements(3 mappings)

AEO-11Risk management and threat assessment
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
AEO-7Business partner security
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-04Suppliers are known and prioritized by criticality
AEO-9Information security and IT systems
→NIST-CSF-PR.DS-01The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected

AEO Eligibility and Compliance(6 mappings)

AEO-2Customs compliance record3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
AEO-4Financial solvency3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk

WCO SAFE Pillar 1 - Customs-to-Customs(5 mappings)

P1-S1Advance electronic information2 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-07Opportunities for improvements are identified from risk assessments
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-09Integrity and accuracy of risk assessment results are verified
P1-S2Risk management3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-03Cybersecurity risk management activities and outcomes are included in enterprise risk
→NIST-CSF-GV.RM-04Strategic direction for cybersecurity risk management is established
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established

WCO SAFE Pillar 2 - Customs-to-Business(4 mappings)

P2-S1Partnership programme (AEO)3 targets
→NIST-CSF-GV.SC-01Cybersecurity supply chain risk management program is established
→NIST-CSF-ID.AM-04Inventories of services provided by suppliers are maintained
→NIST-CSF-ID.RA-10Critical suppliers are assessed on the basis of their risk
P2-S3Authorization and validation
→NIST-CSF-PR.AA-05Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined and managed

Related Comparisons

Other Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards comparisons

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 57 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs ISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management6 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs FBI CJIS Security Policy6 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)5 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST Privacy Framework5 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence5 mappingsAuthorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards vs NIST SP 1800-325 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards has 36 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AEO Eligibility and Compliance, where 13 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 36 total Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls, 9 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

27 Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in AEO Eligibility and Compliance with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Programmes - Global Standards and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is AEO Eligibility and Compliance (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.