Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsUS ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security with 43% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 28 — Civil Court Jurisdiction
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
AT-DSG-12Section 62 — Administrative Penalties
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-2Section 2 — Scope and Application
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 — Video Surveillance (CCTV)
EU-EAA-CE-02Market Surveillance

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(2 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
US-ITAR-EAR-DS-01Technical Data Protection
AT-DSG-8Section 22 — Functions and Powers
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Other US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 3 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 6 map directly to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

8 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US ITAR and EAR — Export Control and Data Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.