TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018)vsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 50% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls identifies 7 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Part 4: Remedies and Penalties(4 mappings)

AT-DSG-10Section 28 — Civil Court Jurisdiction
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
AT-DSG-11Sections 42-45 — Data Subject Rights Implementation2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
AT-DSG-12Section 62 — Administrative Penalties
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Part 5: Implementation of the Law Enforcement Directive(4 mappings)

AT-DSG-13Section 36 — Scope of Law Enforcement Processing2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
AT-DSG-14Section 38 — Data Subject Rights in Law Enforcement2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions(1 mappings)

AT-DSG-6Sections 12-13 — Video Surveillance (CCTV)
→SDWA1433(b)(2)Strategies for Resilience

Part 3: Data Protection Authority(1 mappings)

AT-DSG-7Section 18 — Establishment of the Data Protection Authority
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Related Comparisons

Other Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) comparisons

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20229 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 20219 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs 6th Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AMLD6, Directive (EU) 2018/1673)9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs ISO 8000 — Data Quality9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs FATF Recommendation 16 — Virtual Asset Travel Rule9 mappingsAustria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) vs Privacy by Design (PbD) — Seven Foundational Principles9 mappings

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements12 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsTEFCA — Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) has 14 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions, where 4 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 14 total Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls, 7 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 7 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

7 Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Austria Data Protection Act (Datenschutzgesetz, DSG, amended 2018) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Part 2: GDPR Implementation and Supplementary Provisions (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.