TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
44%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 44% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Supply Chain and Dependencies(7 mappings)

A03:2025Software Supply Chain Failures3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
AESCSF-SC-1Supply Chain Risk Management4 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-25Outsourcing of ICT Services
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-1Asset Inventory
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
AESCSF-ACM-3Change Management
→EIOPA-GL-15ICT Project and Change Management

Identity and Access Management(3 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control3 targets
→DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
→EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
→TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements

Situational Awareness and Event Management(2 mappings)

AESCSF-SA-1Logging and Monitoring
→GLI33-4.4Audit Trail and Logging
AESCSF-SA-2Anomaly Detection
→EIOPA-GL-11Security Monitoring

Threat and Vulnerability Management(6 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment2 targets
→38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs
→39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence3 targets
→EIOPA-GL-19ICT Third-Party Risk Management
→EIOPA-GL-4ICT and Security Risks Within the Risk Management System
→TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
→GLI33-4.2Penetration Testing

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)22 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)21 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (44% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 10 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 17 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 44% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

22 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.