TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF)vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 38% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Asset, Change, and Configuration Management(1 mappings)

AESCSF-ACM-2Configuration Management
→AWWA-4.3Configuration Management

Identity and Access Management(5 mappings)

AESCSF-IAM-1Identity Management
→AWWA-2.3Account Management
AESCSF-IAM-2Access Control3 targets
→AWWA-1.3Security Awareness and Training
→AWWA-2.1User Access Management
→AWWA-2.4Physical Access Controls
AESCSF-IAM-3Multi-Factor Authentication
→AWWA-2.2Authentication Mechanisms

Event and Incident Response(9 mappings)

AESCSF-IR-1Incident Response Plan3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
AESCSF-IR-2Incident Response Capability3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
AESCSF-IR-3Incident Reporting3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics

Risk Management(5 mappings)

AESCSF-RM-2Risk Assessment Process3 targets
→AWWA-4.4Audit Logging and Monitoring
→AWWA-5.4Backup and Restoration
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
CDP-RM-1Risk Identification Process
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment
CDP-RM-3Value Chain Risk Assessment
→AWWA-1.2Risk Assessment

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) comparisons

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs CSA CCM v424 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs New Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM)22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs MARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges22 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)22 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) has 39 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 25 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 12 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 39 total Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls, 15 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

24 Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.