TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience StandardvsLaos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard maps to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) with 14% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 19 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Checking and Corrective Action.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(2 mappings)

4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis2 targets
→SAPIN2-2Corruption Risk Assessment
→SAPIN2-3Third-Party Due Diligence

Implementation and Operation(4 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority4 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Part 1, Sec. 4Application and Scope
→SAPIN2-1Code of Conduct

Incident Prevention, Preparedness, and Response(1 mappings)

4.4.7Emergency and Incident Response
→LAOS-CC-Art22LaoCERT

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Lloyd's Minimum Standards — Cyber Security6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)6 mappings

Other Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) comparisons

Digital Economy Partnership Agreement (DEPA) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard has 22 controls across its framework, while Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) covers 33 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Checking and Corrective Action, where 5 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

Of 22 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 3 map directly to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 19 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard to Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

19 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015). The highest concentration of gaps is in Checking and Corrective Action with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and Laos Law on Prevention and Combating Cybercrime (2015)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Checking and Corrective Action (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.