TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience StandardvsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 18% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 22 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls identifies 18 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Checking and Corrective Action.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 22 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Policy and Planning(9 mappings)

4.1External Standards4 targets
→5.3Management of Allergens
→7.1Training and Competence
→8.5Production and Service Provision
→8.5.2Identification and Traceability
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities4 targets
→5.3Management of Allergens
→7.1Training and Competence
→8.5Production and Service Provision
→8.5.2Identification and Traceability
4.3.1Risk Assessment and Impact Analysis
→ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

Implementation and Operation(1 mappings)

4.4.1Resources, Roles, Responsibility, and Authority
→9.2Network Domain Security

Related Comparisons

Other ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard comparisons

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Nevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs Lloyd's Minimum Standards — Cyber Security6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines6 mappingsASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard vs SSAE 18 — Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting)6 mappings

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsISO/IEC 27003:2017 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence16 mappingsPIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence15 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence14 mappingsSQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence14 mappings3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security) vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence13 mappingsUK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence13 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence13 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard has 22 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Checking and Corrective Action, where 5 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 22 total ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls, 4 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 18 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

18 ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Checking and Corrective Action with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASIS SPC.1-2009 — Organizational Resilience Standard and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Checking and Corrective Action (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.