ASEAN Data Management FrameworkvsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
See exactly how ASEAN Data Management Framework controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ASEAN Data Management Framework maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 28% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Governance and Oversight(4 mappings)
Policies and Procedural Documents(1 mappings)
Risk Assessment(1 mappings)
Controls and Data Lifecycle(3 mappings)
Monitoring and Continuous Improvement(4 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ASEAN Data Management Framework comparisons
Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ASEAN Data Management Framework and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
ASEAN Data Management Framework has 39 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (28% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 12 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.
How many controls map between ASEAN Data Management Framework and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Of 39 total ASEAN Data Management Framework controls, 11 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 28% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASEAN Data Management Framework to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
28 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ASEAN Data Management Framework and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.