Cross-Framework Mapping

ASEAN Data Management FrameworkvsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)

See exactly how ASEAN Data Management Framework controls map to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASEAN Data Management Framework maps to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) with 23% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Risk Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance and Oversight(4 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure2 targets
EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy
DMF-1.2Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
EBA-GL-3.2.1ICT Governance
EBA-GL-3.4.1Information Security Policy

Risk Assessment(7 mappings)

DMF-4.1Impact Assessment3 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
EBA-GL-3.5.1ICT Operations Management
DMF-4.3Regulatory Risk Assessment2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment
RA-1Security Risk Assessment2 targets
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment

Monitoring and Continuous Improvement(4 mappings)

ISO28001-MI-01Supply Chain Security Monitoring
EBA-GL-3.4.5Security Monitoring
ISO28001-MI-02Internal Security Audits
EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
ISO28001-MI-03Management Review of Security Program
EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers
ISO28001-MI-04Corrective and Preventive Actions
EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers

Related Comparisons

Other ASEAN Data Management Framework comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASEAN Data Management Framework and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

ASEAN Data Management Framework has 39 controls across its framework, while EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Assessment, where 10 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) equivalent.

How many controls map between ASEAN Data Management Framework and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

Of 39 total ASEAN Data Management Framework controls, 9 map directly to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASEAN Data Management Framework to EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

30 ASEAN Data Management Framework controls have no direct equivalent in EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07). The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Assessment with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASEAN Data Management Framework and EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Assessment (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.