TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsPCI DSS 4.0

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to PCI DSS 4.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

89
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
92%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which PCI DSS 4.0 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to PCI DSS 4.0 with 92% coverage across 34 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 3 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Recovering Data and System Availability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 89 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(20 mappings)

ASD37-01Application control (Essential)2 targets
→2.2.4Only necessary services enabled
→pci-dss-4-0::5.2.1An anti-malware solution(s) is deployed on all system components, except for those system components identified in periodic evaluations per Requirement 5.2.3 that concludes the system components are not at risk from malware
ASD37-02Patch applications (Essential)3 targets
→11.3.1Internal vulnerability scans quarterly
→pci-dss-4-0::6.3.1Security vulnerabilities are identified and managed as follows: • New security vulnerabilities are identified using industry-recognized sources for security vulnerability information, including alerts from international and national computer emergency response teams (CERTs). • Vulnerabilities
→pci-dss-4-0::6.3.3All system components are protected from known vulnerabilities by installing applicable security patches/updates as follows: • Patches/updates for critical vulnerabilities (identified according to the risk ranking process at Requirement 6.3.1) are installed within one
ASD37-03Configure Microsoft Office macro settings (Essential)
→2.2.6System security parameters configured
ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)2 targets
→2.2.4Only necessary services enabled
→2.2.6System security parameters configured
ASD37-05Automated dynamic analysis of email and web content (Excellent)
→5.4.1Processes and automated mechanisms are in place to detect and protect personnel against phishing attacks
ASD37-06Email content filtering (Excellent)2 targets
→5.4.1Processes and automated mechanisms are in place to detect and protect personnel against phishing attacks
→pci-dss-4-0::5.2.1An anti-malware solution(s) is deployed on all system components, except for those system components identified in periodic evaluations per Requirement 5.2.3 that concludes the system components are not at risk from malware
ASD37-07Web content filtering (Excellent)
→1.3.2Outbound traffic from CDE restricted
ASD37-08Deny direct internet connectivity (Excellent)2 targets
→1.3.2Outbound traffic from CDE restricted
→1.4.1NSCs between trusted and untrusted networks
ASD37-09OS generic exploit mitigation (Excellent)
→2.2.6System security parameters configured
ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)3 targets
→2.2.1Configuration standards are developed, implemented, and maintained to: • Cover all system components. • Address all known security vulnerabilities. • Be consistent with industry-accepted system hardening standards or vendor hardening recommendations. • Be updated
→2.2.4Only necessary services enabled
→2.2.5Insecure services or protocols documented
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)2 targets
→1.2.5Services, protocols, ports inventoried and justified
→2.2.1Configuration standards are developed, implemented, and maintained to: • Cover all system components. • Address all known security vulnerabilities. • Be consistent with industry-accepted system hardening standards or vendor hardening recommendations. • Be updated

+69 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to PCI DSS 4.0 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which PCI DSS 4.0 controls your existing ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into PCI DSS 4.0 lands at 12%, while PCI DSS 4.0 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents lands at 48.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents evidence buys you for PCI DSS 4.0, the other asks the reverse.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents into PCI DSS 4.0
12%

30 of 249 PCI DSS 4.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents. 219 are genuine gaps.

31.6%Req 1: Network Security Controls
38.5%Req 5: Anti-Malware
10.8%Req 12: Information Security Policies
36.4%Req 2: Secure Configurations
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 59 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 1.3.1 Inbound traffic to CDE restricted

ASD segmentation denies traffic between computers unless required, restricting inbound flows.

Grounded in ASD37-22 Network segmentation (Excellent). Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 1.1.1 NSC policies and procedures documented

All security policies and operational procedures for Requirement 1 are documented, kept current, in use, and known to affected parties.

Every one of the 30 evidenced controls and 219 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

PCI DSS 4.0 into ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents
48.6%

18 of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls are evidenced by work you have already done for PCI DSS 4.0. 19 are genuine gaps.

47.1%Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution
60%Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents
50%Detecting Cyber Security Incidents and Responding
100%Preventing Malicious Insiders
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 74 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: ASD37-06 Email content filtering (Excellent)

Automated mechanisms detecting and protecting personnel against phishing is email content filtering.

Grounded in 5.4.1 Processes and automated mechanisms are in place to detect and protect personnel against phishing attacks. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: ASD37-01 Application control (Essential)

Application control to prevent execution of unapproved/malicious programs including .exe, DLL, scripts and installers.

Every one of the 18 evidenced controls and 19 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to PCI DSS 4.0
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 92% in the header counts how many ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many PCI DSS 4.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 537 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27002:202237 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.037 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs ISO 27001:202237 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CMMC 2.037 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs CIS Controls v837 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs NIST SP 800-171 Rev 336 mappingsASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents vs FedRAMP High36 mappings

Other PCI DSS 4.0 comparisons

SOC 2 vs PCI DSS 4.0247 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs PCI DSS 4.0247 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PCI DSS 4.0246 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PCI DSS 4.0246 mappingsFedRAMP Moderate vs PCI DSS 4.0245 mappingsFedRAMP High vs PCI DSS 4.0245 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Revision 5.1 HIGH vs PCI DSS 4.0240 mappingsCloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 vs PCI DSS 4.0240 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 686 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and PCI DSS 4.0?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while PCI DSS 4.0 covers 249 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 34 overlapping controls (92% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Recovering Data and System Availability, where 2 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct PCI DSS 4.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and PCI DSS 4.0?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 34 map directly to PCI DSS 4.0 controls, representing 92% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to PCI DSS 4.0?

3 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in PCI DSS 4.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Recovering Data and System Availability with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and PCI DSS 4.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Recovering Data and System Availability (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.