Cross-Framework Mapping

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security IncidentsvsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
17
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 38% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls identifies 23 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution(4 mappings)

ASD37-04User application hardening (Essential)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
ASD37-10Server application hardening (Very Good)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
ASD37-11Operating system hardening (Very Good)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
ASD37-17TLS encryption between email servers (Limited)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Limiting the Extent of Cyber Security Incidents(12 mappings)

ASD37-18Restrict administrative privileges (Essential)2 targets
NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
ASD37-20Multi-factor authentication (Essential)4 targets
NISTPF-3Control-P - Privacy Controls, Data Management, and Disassociated Processing
NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)
ASD37-22Network segmentation (Excellent)
NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
ASD37-23Protect authentication credentials (Excellent)
NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
ASD37-25Software firewall - inbound (Very Good)
NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
ASD37-27Outbound data loss prevention (Very Good)3 targets
NISTPF-4Communicate-P - Privacy Notice, Transparency, and Individual Awareness
NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Recovering Data and System Availability(3 mappings)

ASD37-34Regular backups (Essential)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
ASD37-35Business continuity and disaster recovery plans (Very Good)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
ASD37-36System recovery capabilities (Very Good)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Preventing Malicious Insiders(1 mappings)

ASD37-37Personnel management (Very Good)
NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

Related Comparisons

Other ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents comparisons

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework?

ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents has 37 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution, where 13 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 37 total ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls, 14 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 23 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents to NIST Privacy Framework?

23 ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ASD Strategies to Mitigate Cyber Security Incidents and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is Preventing Malware Delivery and Execution (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.