Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles

See exactly how AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
57
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System maps to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 61 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 68 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 61 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-26262-8-7Configuration management
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
ISO-26262-3-7Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
ISO-26262-3-5Item definition

Planning (Clause 6)(1 mappings)

ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO-26262-3-7Hazard analysis and risk assessment (HARA)

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System has 61 controls across its framework, while ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles covers 69 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation, where 12 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

Of 61 total AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 4 map directly to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 68 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System to ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

68 AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System and ISO 26262:2018 - Functional Safety for Road Vehicles?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.