Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsUS Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
31
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(5 mappings)

8.3Design and Development2 targets
CPSC-CS.4Vulnerability Disclosure
CPSC-PM.2Product Recall Procedures
AS9100D-8.5Production and Service Provision2 targets
CPSC-CS.4Vulnerability Disclosure
CPSC-PM.2Product Recall Procedures
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
CPSC-RA.3Lifecycle Risk Assessment

Leadership (Clause 5)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment2 targets
CPSC-CS.4Vulnerability Disclosure
CPSC-PM.2Product Recall Procedures

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety covers 20 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 11 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 4 map directly to US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety?

34 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) — Connected Product Safety?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.