TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsPropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
37
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(1 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→PTSS-5.1BMS Hardening

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System16 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products15 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202113 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts13 mappings

Other PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity comparisons

CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity11 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 13 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 1 map directly to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

37 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and PropTech Security Standards — Smart Building Cybersecurity?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.