AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsIATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual
See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Other IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual covers 26 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 14 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual equivalent.
How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 1 map directly to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
37 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and IATA Operational Safety Audit (IOSA) Standards Manual?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.