TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(2 mappings)

9.2Network Domain Security2 targets
→FEDRAMP-AC-1Access Control Policy and Procedures
→FEDRAMP-AC-2Account Management

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
→ICS-PM-2System hardening
ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment
→ICS-RA-3Risk assessment methodology

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System16 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs ISO/IEC 27003:201716 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products15 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food14 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)13 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 202113 mappingsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence vs NIS2 Directive Implementing Acts13 mappings

Other CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines23 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines22 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines21 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 12 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 3 map directly to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

35 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.