Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)vsCMMC 2.0

See exactly how APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls map to CMMC 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) maps to CMMC 2.0 with 25% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Board and Senior Management(1 mappings)

SPS220-16Designated Risk Management Function
RA.L2-3.11.1Risk Assessments

Risk Management(1 mappings)

SPS220-17Maintenance of a Risk Management Framework
RA.L2-3.11.1Risk Assessments

Reporting(1 mappings)

SPS220-44APRA Notification of Framework Breach within 10 Business Days
IR.L2-3.6.2Incident Reporting

Assurance(4 mappings)

SPS220-46Triennial Comprehensive Review of the Framework
CA.L2-3.12.1Security Control Assessment
SPS220-P28Annual Review in Non Comprehensive Review Years2 targets
CA.L2-3.12.3Security Control Monitoring
CA.L2-3.12.4System Security Plan
SPS220-P31Assessment Following Material Developments Outside the Review Cycle
CA.L2-3.12.1Security Control Assessment

Audit(1 mappings)

SPS220-48Internal and External Audit Arrangements
CA.L2-3.12.1Security Control Assessment
Coverage crosswalk

A APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) to CMMC 2.0 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which CMMC 2.0 controls your existing APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) into CMMC 2.0
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

CMMC 2.0 into APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation)
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) to CMMC 2.0 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 25% in the header counts how many APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many CMMC 2.0 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) and CMMC 2.0?

APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) has 28 controls across its framework, while CMMC 2.0 covers 110 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Risk Management, where 5 APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls have no direct CMMC 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) and CMMC 2.0?

Of 28 total APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls, 7 map directly to CMMC 2.0 controls, representing 25% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) to CMMC 2.0?

21 APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) controls have no direct equivalent in CMMC 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA SPS 220 Risk Management (Superannuation) and CMMC 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.