TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)vsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)

See exactly how APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls map to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
30
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) maps to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) with 10% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third-Party Management and Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Board and Governance Responsibilities(1 mappings)

CPS234.15Roles and Responsibilities
→AWWA-1.1Security Policy and Governance

Incident Management and Notification(9 mappings)

CPS234.24Incident Response Mechanisms3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
CPS234.25Incident Response Plans3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics
CPS234.26APRA Notification (72 Hours)3 targets
→AWWA-5.1Incident Response Plan
→AWWA-5.5Exercises and Testing
→ICS-IR-2ICS-specific forensics

Related Comparisons

Other APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) comparisons

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs ISO/IEC 30111:20195 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs C5 (Germany)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs CAIQ (CSA)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments5 mappings

Other AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) comparisons

CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsSouth Korea ISMS-P vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)18 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) has 40 controls across its framework, while AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) covers 46 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third-Party Management and Testing, where 5 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls have no direct AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

Of 40 total APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls, 4 map directly to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) to AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

36 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association). The highest concentration of gaps is in Third-Party Management and Testing with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third-Party Management and Testing (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.