TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia)vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 12% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Third-Party Management and Testing.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.

Board and Governance Responsibilities(1 mappings)

CPS234.15Roles and Responsibilities
→NRC73-CTL-01Access Control for CDAs

Incident Management and Notification(11 mappings)

CPS234.24Incident Response Mechanisms3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
CPS234.25Incident Response Plans3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
CPS234.26APRA Notification (72 Hours)3 targets
→CA-ITSG33-SC-01Security Control Catalogue
→KR-CSAP-SC-01Information Security Management
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management
CPS234.27Control Weakness Notification (10 Days)2 targets
→NZ-NZISM-SC-02ICT Security Controls
→PAS1192-5-SC-03Breach Management

Related Comparisons

Other APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) comparisons

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs ISO/IEC 30111:20195 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs C5 (Germany)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs CISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.05 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs CAIQ (CSA)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs ASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs NIST AI 600-1 Generative AI Profile5 mappingsAPRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) vs Canada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management5 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments17 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments16 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 769 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) has 40 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Third-Party Management and Testing, where 5 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 40 total APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls, 5 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

35 APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Third-Party Management and Testing with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 — Information Security (Australia) and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Third-Party Management and Testing (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.