Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsOWASP Top 10:2025

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to OWASP Top 10:2025. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to OWASP Top 10:2025 with 17% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 503K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 503K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(1 mappings)

CPS234-05Roles and responsibilities definition
FHIR-SEC-3.3Scope-Based Authorization

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(6 mappings)

CPS234-09Encryption and key management4 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
A04:2025Insecure Design
A04:2025Insecure Design
CPS234-10Secure configuration standards2 targets
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures
A02:2025Cryptographic Failures

Controls(2 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)

CPS234-21Implementation of Controls2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Assurance(2 mappings)

CPS234-23Frequency and Methodology of Testing2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Audit(2 mappings)

CPS234-25Internal Audit of Information Security2 targets
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures
A09:2025Security Logging and Monitoring Failures

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (503K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while OWASP Top 10:2025 covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct OWASP Top 10:2025 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 9 map directly to OWASP Top 10:2025 controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to OWASP Top 10:2025?

36 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP Top 10:2025. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and OWASP Top 10:2025?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.