TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsNIST Privacy Framework

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to NIST Privacy Framework. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

29
Controls Mapped
6
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to NIST Privacy Framework with 29% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 29 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

CPS234-06Network security and segmentation
→NISTPF-5Protect-P Access Control (PR.AC-P)
CPS234-09Encryption and key management
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
CPS234-10Secure configuration standards
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(7 mappings)

CPS234-11Business continuity planning and testing2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)
CPS234-12Disaster recovery procedures
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)
CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)
CPS234-15Information Security Capability2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)

Governance(2 mappings)

CPS234-14Roles and Responsibilities2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)

Capability(2 mappings)

CPS234-15Information Security Capability2 targets
→NISTPF-6Protect-P Data Security (PR.DS-P)
→NISTPF-7Protect-P Maintenance and Protective Technology (PR.MA-P, PR.PT-P)

Third Party(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
→NISTPF-1Identify-P - Business Environment, Data Processing Inventory, Ecosystem, and Risk Assessment
→NISTPF-2Govern-P - Governance Policies, Risk Management Strategy, Awareness Training, and Monitoring
→NISTPF-8Protect-P Information Protection Processes (PR.PO-P)

+9 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons

APRA CPS 234 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 525 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PSD2 SCA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs OSFI B-1316 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Open Banking Security16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs Monetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs HKMA SPM16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs GLBA16 mappingsAPRA CPS 234 vs PCI SSF16 mappings

Other NIST Privacy Framework comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 38500:2024 - Governance of IT vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsISO/IEC 23837 - Security Requirements for Quantum Key Distribution vs NIST Privacy Framework7 mappingsVietnam PDPD vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappingsVermont Artificial Intelligence and Consumer Data Act (AICDA) vs NIST Privacy Framework6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and NIST Privacy Framework?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while NIST Privacy Framework covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct NIST Privacy Framework equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and NIST Privacy Framework?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 14 map directly to NIST Privacy Framework controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to NIST Privacy Framework?

31 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Privacy Framework. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and NIST Privacy Framework?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.