APRA CPS 234vsJapan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions
See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
APRA CPS 234 maps to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions with 26% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 31 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 720 frameworks | 432K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 9 domains. Sign up to explore all 432K+ mappings across 720 frameworks.
APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(2 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Operational Resilience(3 mappings)
Third Party(3 mappings)
APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(9 mappings)
Asset Management(3 mappings)
+12 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 720 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other APRA CPS 234 comparisons
Other Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 720 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 720 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (432K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions equivalent.
How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 14 map directly to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 31 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
31 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and Japan FSA Cybersecurity Guidelines for Financial Institutions?
The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.