Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 234vsISO 27005

See exactly how APRA CPS 234 controls map to ISO 27005. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

19
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 234 maps to ISO 27005 with 17% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 APRA CPS 234 controls identifies 36 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 732 frameworks | 512K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 19 of 19 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 512K+ mappings across 732 frameworks.

APRA CPS 234: Information Security Governance(1 mappings)

CPS234-04Security policy framework
5.1Logical Access Control

APRA CPS 234: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)

CPS234-09Encryption and key management
9.1Risk communication and consultation

Third Party(3 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

APRA CPS 234: Third-Party Risk Management(10 mappings)

CPS234-16Capability of Third Parties3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
CPS234-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance
CPS234-19Information Security Policy Framework
5.1Logical Access Control
CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Policy(1 mappings)

CPS234-19Information Security Policy Framework
5.1Logical Access Control

Asset Management(3 mappings)

CPS234-20Information Asset Identification and Classification3 targets
ISO27005-01Risk management policy and scope
ISO27005-05Risk management integration
ISO27005-18Risk register maintenance

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 732 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 732 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (512K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 27005?

APRA CPS 234 has 35 controls across its framework, while ISO 27005 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting, where 5 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct ISO 27005 equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 27005?

Of 35 total APRA CPS 234 controls, 9 map directly to ISO 27005 controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 36 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 234 to ISO 27005?

36 APRA CPS 234 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27005. The highest concentration of gaps is in APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 234 and ISO 27005?

The domain with the highest gap count is APRA CPS 234: Incident Management & Reporting (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.