Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsGAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice with 6% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 52 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Operations(1 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)

Business Continuity(2 mappings)

CPS230-27Incident Management
GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)
CPS230-28Recovery Objectives
GAMP5-Supplier-Operations-Change-PeriodicSupplier Assessment, Operational Phase, Change Control and Periodic Review

Service Provider Management(1 mappings)

CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
GAMP5-2nd-Edition-AI-Cloud-Agile-CSA2nd Edition (2022) - AI/ML, Cloud, Agile, DevOps and Computer Software Assurance (CSA)

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 47 controls across its framework, while GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 11 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

Of 47 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 52 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

52 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.