Cross-Framework Mapping

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk ManagementvsBREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method

See exactly how APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls map to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
9%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management maps to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method with 9% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 43 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls identifies 39 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Service Provider Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 43 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operational Risk Management Framework(2 mappings)

CPS230-11Risk Identification and Assessment
PMF-M.3Privacy Risk Assessment
CPS230-13Incident Management
PMF-M.4Privacy Incident Management

Business Continuity(1 mappings)

CPS230-27BCP Scope
Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials

Service Provider Management(1 mappings)

CPS230-49Internal Audit of Service Providers
Mat 03Responsible Sourcing of Materials

Related Comparisons

Other APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management comparisons

Other BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management has 43 controls across its framework, while BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (9% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Service Provider Management, where 12 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method equivalent.

How many controls map between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

Of 43 total APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls, 4 map directly to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method controls — representing 9% coverage. The remaining 39 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management to BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

39 APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management controls have no direct equivalent in BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method. The highest concentration of gaps is in Service Provider Management with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between APRA CPS 230 Operational Risk Management and BREEAM — Building Research Establishment Environmental Assessment Method?

The domain with the highest gap count is Service Provider Management (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.