TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

API 1164vsITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how API 1164 controls map to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
21
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

API 1164 maps to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 12% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 24 API 1164 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 24 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

API 1164: Access Management(3 mappings)

API1164-06Physical and logical access controls
→X805-D1Access Control
API1164-07Personnel risk assessment
→X805-D1Access Control
API1164-09Interactive remote access security
→X805-D1Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other API 1164 comparisons

API 1164 vs NIST SP 1800-3216 mappingsAPI 1164 vs ISO 2701916 mappingsAPI 1164 vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs BIMCO Cyber Security16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEC 6244316 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIS2 Directive16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs IEEE 168616 mappingsAPI 1164 vs C2M216 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

EU Maritime Single Window Environment Regulation (EU) 2019/1239 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework Version 1.0 vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between API 1164 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

API 1164 has 24 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery, where 5 API 1164 controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between API 1164 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 24 total API 1164 controls, 3 map directly to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping API 1164 to ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

21 API 1164 controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between API 1164 and ITU-T X.805 — Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is API 1164: Incident Response & Recovery (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.