Cross-Framework Mapping

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
5%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 5% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in AML/CTF Program Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Customer Identification (KYC)(1 mappings)

AMLCTF-35Identity Verification Standard
FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

AML/CTF Program Requirements(4 mappings)

AMLCTF-PartA-RiskAssessML/TF Risk Assessment4 targets
FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))
FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))
FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Related Comparisons

Other AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) has 39 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in AML/CTF Program Requirements, where 10 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 39 total AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls, 2 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

37 AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in AML/CTF Program Requirements with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AML/CTF Act 2006 (Australia) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is AML/CTF Program Requirements (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.