TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)vsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
18
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements with 25% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 28 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter I: General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 28 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter IV: Controller and Processor Obligations(6 mappings)

AL-DPA-12Article 16 — Security Obligations2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty
AL-DPA-14Article 18 — Transfer of Data Abroad
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
AO-DPA-12Article 16 — Notification to APD
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
AO-DPA-13Article 17 — Confidentiality Obligations2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Chapter V: Supervisory Authority(2 mappings)

AL-DPA-17Article 21 — Sanctions and Penalties
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers
BA-DPA-13Article 22 — Personal Data Protection Agency
→ZMDPA-ENF-01Data Protection Commissioner Powers

Chapter I: General Provisions(2 mappings)

BA-DPA-2Article 2 — Definitions2 targets
→CASL-ENF-02Compliance and Due Diligence
→RIDTPPA-11Unauthorized Disclosure Penalty

Related Comparisons

Other Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) comparisons

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Digital Services Act (DSA) - Regulation (EU) 2022/206511 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020)11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs North Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020)11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Portugal Law No. 58/2019 — Data Protection Implementation Act11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs EU Digital Services Act (Regulation (EU) 2022/2065)11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs African Union Malabo Convention11 mappingsAlbania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) vs MiFID II / MiFIR11 mappings

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements12 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsFTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements11 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsTEFCA — Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappingsNevada Gaming Control Board Cybersecurity Requirements vs US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements10 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) has 28 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter I: General Provisions, where 8 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 28 total Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls, 7 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

21 Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter I: General Provisions with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014) and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) — Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter I: General Provisions (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.