Cross-Framework Mapping

3GPP SecurityvsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security

See exactly how 3GPP Security controls map to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
22
Gaps Found
29%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

3GPP Security maps to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security with 29% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 31 3GPP Security controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3GPP Security: Communications Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 31 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3GPP Security: Information Security Policies(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-04Roles and responsibilities definition
62351-2Glossary of terms

3GPP Security: Access Control(3 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-12User access management and provisioning
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
3GPP-SEC-13Authentication and password management
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
3GPP-SEC-14Privileged access management
62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)

3GPP Security: Cryptography(4 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-17Encryption of data at rest
62351-9Cyber security key management
3GPP-SEC-18Encryption of data in transit
62351-9Cyber security key management
3GPP-SEC-19Certificate management
62351-9Cyber security key management
3GPP-SEC-20Key lifecycle management
62351-9Cyber security key management

3GPP Security: Operations Security(1 mappings)

3GPP-SEC-24Logging and monitoring
62351-14Cyber security event logging

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between 3GPP Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

3GPP Security has 31 controls across its framework, while IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security covers 14 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (29% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3GPP Security: Communications Security, where 5 3GPP Security controls have no direct IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security equivalent.

How many controls map between 3GPP Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

Of 31 total 3GPP Security controls, 9 map directly to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls — representing 29% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping 3GPP Security to IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

22 3GPP Security controls have no direct equivalent in IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in 3GPP Security: Communications Security with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between 3GPP Security and IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3GPP Security: Communications Security (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.